On Mon, 12.05.2008 at 13:09:01 -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > In my case, I believe it would be useful to provide an ability to tell > sysctl(8) to report on everything asked for that it does know, and > ignore the OIDs it doesn't know. > > Is this percpetion so radical that I'm way off base? If so, please > educate me as to why. > > Otherwise, I'll plan on filing a PR with the attached patch, which adds > "-i" to sysctl(8)'s flags -- and which appears to work as described above:
Hi David, I find this functionality very useful, but the addition of another flag as problematic. First of all, old releases don't have it. Secondly, the behaviour you describe should be the default anyway (IMHO). So, when requesting OID a, b, and c, sysctl should print a, a warning that it cannot find OID b (to STDERR), then print c and exit with a return code != 0. At least, that's what I would code it to do. Cheers, Ulrich Spoerlein -- It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak, and remove all doubt. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
