Hi, Dimitry

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimi...@andric.com> wrote:
> On 2009-05-20 13:18, Tobias Fendin wrote:
>> Does the child really die? I did a little test:
>>
>> # /etc/rc.d/sshd status
>> sshd is not running.
>> # nc -l 22 >/tmp/ssh_test &
>> [1] 1733
>> # /etc/rc.d/sshd start
>> Starting sshd.
>> # /etc/rc.d/sshd status
>> sshd is running as pid 1740.
>
> This is because sshd binds to both IPv4 and IPv6 ports.  The IPv4 bind
> fails, as you will see in syslog, while the IPv6 bind succeeds.  Thus
> sshd keeps on running.
>
> If you start two nc's (I don't know any way to do this with one
> instance), e.g.:
>
> nc -4 -l 22 > /tmp/ssh_test4 &
> nc -6 -l 22 > /tmp/ssh_test6 &
>
> and then try starting sshd, you should see it quit.
>

It's not an IPv4 versus IPv6 problem.  How I tested this, as I had
this problem in the past (which was a non-standard setup, but still a
problem):

sshd was listening on :25, both IPv4 and IPv6
sendmail was listening on :25 (because I had forgotten to disable it)

The system boots, and sendmail starts before sshd.  When sshd starts
(or tries to) there is no console output that it had failed.  The only
way you realize it is not running, is when you cannot remotely log in.

-- 
Glen Barber
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to