Maslan wrote:
OpenKETA has its own kthread_create() with a little modification from
kthread_create(), it associates the new thread with curthread not with
the thread0.

hey that's horrible...
(overiding a kernel symbol)


See /usr/sys/kern/kern_kthread.c: kthread_create()
        error = fork1(&thread0, RFMEM | RFFDG | RFPROC | RFSTOPPED | flags,
            pages, &p2);
OpenKETA:kthread_create()
        error = fork1(curthread, RFFDG | RFPROC | RFSTOPPED | flags,
            pages, &p2);

in 8.0 you can do this..
(see man kthread)



I'll give it a try and see if it works.
BUT i still can't understand why kern_open() don't work, except in the
original thread.

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Maslan<maslan...@gmail.com> wrote:
yes kio http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/misc/kernio/
However, It's outdated.

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Ed Schouten<e...@80386.nl> wrote:
* Maslan <maslan...@gmail.com> wrote:
Is it possible to call kern_open() from within a kernel thread anyway?
I think yes, It worked on the parent thread before creating a new kthread.
See OpenKETA source, its using the same approach.
kern_open() depends on a file descriptor table, right?
Yes, it returns a fd in the curthread->td_retval[0], which i should
use within the same thread to deal with this file.
Didn't someone (Jeff Roberson?) develop some nice in-kernel API for
accessing files some years ago? Why not use that?

--
 Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/

_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to