2009/9/3 Robert Eckardt <r...@robert-eckardt.de>

> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:09:19 +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Eckardt
> > <robert.ecka...@robert-eckardt.de> wrote:
> > > Do I have to be worried?
> > > Is there a memory leak in the current ZFS implementation?
> > > Why is used space growing slower than free space is shrinking?
> > > Is there some garbage collection needed in ZFS?
> > >
> > > Besides, although the backup server has 3 GB RAM I had to tune arc_max
> > > to 150MB to copy the backed-up data from an 2.8TB ZFS (v6) to the
> > > 4.5 TB ZFS (v13) by "zfs send|zfs recv" without kmalloc panic.
> > > (I.e., the defaults algorithm was not sufficient.)
> >
> >  Do I take you are using ZFS snapshots in between rsync'ing
> > (send/recv requires snapshots) ? Could you please post the "zfs
> > list" output after subsequent runs to clarify ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Adrian
> > EnterpriseBSD
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> no I'm not using snapshots. Just seperate directories, where identical
> files are hardlinked by rsync to the version one day older.
> The send|recv was neccessary when I increased the raidz of the backup-fs.
> (Copying everthing to two 1.5TB HDDs and after adding disks back again.
> I used s.th. like "zfs send bigpool/b...@backup | zfs recv big/big".)
>
> Here the zfs list of the last five days:
> Thu Sep  3 09:36:12 CEST 2009  (Today add. 2GB of data were transfered.)
> big          1861882752          0 1861882752     0%        5 14545959
> 0%   /big
> big/big      4676727168 2814844416 1861882752    60% 43137409 14545959
> 75%   /big/big
> NAME      USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
> big      2.72T  1.73T  31.5K  /big
> big/big  2.72T  1.73T  2.62T  /big/big
>
> Wed Sep  2 09:36:24 CEST 2009
> big          1869058944        128 1869058816     0%        5 14602022
> 0%   /big
> big/big      4679698688 2810639872 1869058816    60% 43226966 14602022
> 75%   /big/big
> NAME      USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
> big      2.72T  1.74T  31.5K  /big
> big/big  2.72T  1.74T  2.62T  /big/big
>
> Tue Sep  1 09:36:33 CEST 2009
> big          1875352064          0 1875352064     0%        5 14651188
> 0%   /big
> big/big      4683241856 2807889792 1875352064    60% 43316454 14651188
> 75%   /big/big
> NAME      USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
> big      2.71T  1.75T  31.5K  /big
> big/big  2.71T  1.75T  2.62T  /big/big
>
> Mon Aug 31 09:45:26 CEST 2009
> big          1881967616        128 1881967488     0%        5 14702871
> 0%   /big
> big/big      4686380928 2804413440 1881967488    60% 43406044 14702871
> 75%   /big/big
> NAME      USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
> big      2.71T  1.75T  31.5K  /big
> big/big  2.71T  1.75T  2.61T  /big/big
>
> Sun Aug 30 09:39:31 CEST 2009
> big          1891064192          0 1891064192     0%        5 14773939
> 0%   /big
> big/big      4694821376 2803757184 1891064192    60% 43496712 14773939
> 75%   /big/big
> NAME      USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
> big      2.70T  1.76T  31.5K  /big
> big/big  2.70T  1.76T  2.61T  /big/big
>
> Regards,
> Robert
>
> --
> Dr. Robert Eckardt    ---    robert.ecka...@robert-eckardt.de
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>

do a " zfs list -t all"

you will see all snapshots and zvols then as well
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to