Dag-Erling Smørgrav schrieb am 2009-09-24: > Alexander Best <alexbes...@math.uni-muenster.de> writes: > > i remember a discussion about HAMMER support on one of the > > mailingslists which > > sorta ended with the following statement:
> > "let's get zfs running properly before we even think about starting > > with > > HAMMER." > Not a valid argument; regardless of the state of ZFS, one does not > preclude the other unless you expect the same person to handle both. > The one and only reason why HAMMER is not in the base system is that > nobody has stepped forward to do it. > DES my thoughts exactly. i'd really like to use HAMMER as a ufs2 replacement on my box. zfs seems like a great fs but to me it seems too complicated to be handled by the average user. i'm really looking forward to the first few lines of code in p4. ;) cheers. alex _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
