On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 06:27:18AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote: > >On 2009-11-18 23:19:14, Julian Elischer wrote: > >>Wine is an exceptional bit of software, in many ways. > >>One way it is exceptional is that it uses the system in a number of > >>ways that nothing else does. For example it sets various special > >>segment register settings and defines several different > >>segments on the LDT. This is something that is different to some > >>extent between i386 and amd64 and it is possible that > >>the code for 386 LDT syscalls under amd64 may not work correctly. > >>nothing else would test this. > >> > > > >I agree and would also have likely not even tried if it wasn't for > >reading on FreeBSD's own wiki (amonst other places) that it should > >actually work fine. I've tried various versions and always get the > >same result: > > > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine > > > > "FreeBSD currently lacks support for 32bit ports on a 64bit system. > > However, with a little bit of effort you can build and use the 32 bit > > wine executable on an amd64 system (Diablo 2 works just fine)." > > > >His instructions show an essentially identical setup to mine (apart > >from the fact that he's running a chroot and I'm running a jail). > > jail may not alow you to do the LDT system calls. There are no restrictions for the sysarch(I386_GET/SET_LDT), neither for root-only, nor for inside the jail.
> > have you tried a chroot? > > > > >Even any ideas on how to debug this would help. > > > >xw > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
pgpKnkiY0PUkN.pgp
Description: PGP signature