On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 06:55, gleb.kurtsou@ wrote:
On (25/02/2009 17:24), Mel wrote:
Hi,
attached is a small patch to add threshold support to du(1). I've been using
it on 7-STABLE machines for a while, cause I got tired of the noise I get
when sorting and then reformatting to human-readable. Especially since
sorting isn't part of the equasion "I'd like to see all dirs exceeding a
given size".
I've not updated the manpage on -STABLE yet, should be the same as HEAD.
Example usage:
# du -xht 20m .
29M ./contrib/binutils
52M ./contrib/gcc
237M ./contrib
35M ./crypto
28M ./lib
20M ./share
55M ./sys/dev
139M ./sys
545M .
I'll file a PR for it, if there's no objections to this feature /
implementation, the style(9) or the usage of -t.
--
Mel
Hi,
I've cleaned up original patch:
* fixed style and some bugs
* as suggested changed it to use expand_number
* implemented support for negative threshold values
I find the patch very useful. Does it look ok to be commited, or should
I file a PR so it won't get lost once again.
Example usage:
src/sys/crypto % du -ht 100k
137K ./des
482K .
src/sys/crypto % du -A -ht +100k
129K ./des
446K .
src/sys/crypto % du -ht -100k
56K ./camellia
11K ./salsa20
38K ./sha2
9.0K ./rc4
68K ./des/arch/i386
70K ./des/arch
88K ./rijndael
37K ./via
8.0K ./hmac
36K ./blowfish/arch/i386
37K ./blowfish/arch
85K ./blowfish
Also not to be picky but I can see this being raised in another email at a
later time.
For Each
du -ht +1.5{M,G,T,P}
Would be something nice to compliment this so you do not have to revert
back to say "1440k" when wanting to say 1.5m and so on for larger sizes.
Also I think to be fully supportive it should have the capability to do at
the least -N bits & +-N bytes.
Thanks for the work that you have done on this.
--
jhell
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
