The following reply was made to PR kern/93422; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jo?o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kern/93422: Re: ipfw divert rule 
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:55:50 +0900

 Hi,
 
 >>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:48:01 GMT
 >>>>> Jo?o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
 
 joao> I guess the following rules should be basicly the same and should work 
and work on 5.4-R but the former ones do not work on releng_6, the count stays 0
 
 joao> ipfw add 1000 divert 8669 proto ip
 joao> 01000 divert 8669 ip from any to any proto ip
 
 The ipfw supports an IPv6 on 6.x and later.  It broke a syntax for a
 tunnel.  So, this was changed to mean an IPv4 over IPv4 tunnel on
 6.1-PRERELEASE and later.
 
 
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c.diff?r1=1.79&r2=1.80
 
 Sincerely,
 
 --
 Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED],jp.}FreeBSD.org
 http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to