Hello
Roman Bogorodskiy schrieb: > Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > >> Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: >>> +.It Cm setdf Ar value >>> +Changes >>> +.Cm DF >>> +bit of the IP packet. >>> +Value may be 0 (May Fragment) or 1 (Don't Fragment). >> May be, it would be more handy make this feature via modifier >> (not an action). >> Rule format: >> <action> [setdf|resetdf] <rule body> >> >> Or more extensible, use not only DF modification: >> <action> [{modip [DF|TOS|DSCP|TTL]}] <rule body> > > Yeah, that's nice idea. However, I have already working DF bit stuff and > tos/dscp stuff as well (kern/102471) implemented in another way. And > since committers don't seem to show intested in these > patches/functionaliy, I'm not quite sure if I need to waste time on > re-implementing it because it would be pretty useless if these patches > would hang in GNATS forever. I hope someone will commit it. DSCP/TOS feature in ipfw is pretty useful if you're doing VOIP or QoS in generell. The days where ISPs don't do QoS because they do erything with "over-provesioning" are over. Most do MPLS QoS but thats more for the backbone. I would like to see this patch in the main tree. Of course the DF modification would be nice too. Cheers, Thomas _______________________________________________ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"