Hello
Roman Bogorodskiy schrieb:
> Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>
>> Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
>>> +.It Cm setdf Ar value
>>> +Changes
>>> +.Cm DF
>>> +bit of the IP packet.
>>> +Value may be 0 (May Fragment) or 1 (Don't Fragment).
>> May be, it would be more handy make this feature via modifier
>> (not an action).
>> Rule format:
>> <action> [setdf|resetdf] <rule body>
>>
>> Or more extensible, use not only DF modification:
>> <action> [{modip [DF|TOS|DSCP|TTL]}] <rule body>
>
> Yeah, that's nice idea. However, I have already working DF bit stuff and
> tos/dscp stuff as well (kern/102471) implemented in another way. And
> since committers don't seem to show intested in these
> patches/functionaliy, I'm not quite sure if I need to waste time on
> re-implementing it because it would be pretty useless if these patches
> would hang in GNATS forever.
I hope someone will commit it. DSCP/TOS feature in ipfw is pretty useful
if you're doing VOIP or QoS in generell.
The days where ISPs don't do QoS because they do erything with
"over-provesioning" are over. Most do MPLS QoS but thats more for the
backbone.
I would like to see this patch in the main tree. Of course the DF
modification would be nice too.
Cheers,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
