2009/12/9 Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it>:
> 3. a hash version of 'table's
>
> Right now ipfw tables are implented as routing tables, which is
> great if you have to lookup a longest matching prefix, but a
> bit overkill if you care only for ports or jail ids, and
> totally uninteresting if you want to lookup flow ids,
> or generic sequence of bytes. My plan here is to reuse the
> ipfw hash tables to make them available for 'ipfw table ...'
> commands. To avoid code and syntax bloat, I'd use the number
> 0..TABLE_MAX-1 for the existing prefix tables, and
> TABLE_MAX..2TABLE_MAX-1 for the new hash tables.
>
> comments welcome
>
I think better use another name ('htable' for example) instead of
overloading the old one.
And thanks for great ideas.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
