On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.me...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.me...@gmail.com> wrote: [SNIP] > Luiz has added it to: http://loos.no-ip.org:280/lusca_bridge.diff > > I have tested and it works pretty well. > > I hope someone can add it to -HEAD, so we won't loose it again. With > time, ipfw code changes and such great patches like Rizzo's and > Julian's stop working one day. It's bad we miss such great > functionality.
Sounds like a reasonable request. I hope it is considered. > Thank you again everyone envolved. Thanks goes to you for your persistence in getting this working. > Adrian / Luiz / Julian, > > With this patch fwd does it's job on L2, ordinary proxy works like a > charm. But TPROXY won't work. It would be perfect to have both > features together. If you can suggest any further tests or changes I > will be pleased to test. To be clear, are we getting to the point of having the capability in ipfw of doing something like this in pf: ... pass in quick on $INT_IF route-to lo0 inet proto tcp from any to 127.0.0.1 port 3128 keep state ... ...thus allowing true, transparent proxying? I really thought that this was possible already with ipfw :( I need to do some more reading... I would be very interested in obtaining details on your final setup, once everything is in place and fully functioning :) -Brandon _______________________________________________ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"