On 24.11.2013 19:43, Özkan KIRIK wrote: > Hi, > > I tested patch. This patch solves, ipfw table 1 add 4899 Ok. So I'll commit this fix soon. > > But, ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.01 works incorrectly. > output is below. > # ./ipfw table 1 flush > # ./ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.01 inet_pton() does not recognize this as valid IPv4 address, so it is treated as usigned unteger key. It looks like this behavior is mentioned in STANDARDS section. > # ./ipfw table 1 list > 0.0.0.10/32 0 > > > > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov > <melif...@ipfw.ru>wrote: > > On 19.11.2013 23:55, ᅱzkan KIRIK wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm using kernel FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 #2 r257635 kernel. I am trying >>>> to add port number to ipfw tables. But there is something strange >>>> : Problem is easily repeatable. >>>> >>>> #ipfw table 1 flush #ipfw table 1 add 4899 #ipfw table 1 list ::/0 >>>> 0 >>>> >>>> #ipfw table 1 flush #ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.01 ( not >>>> 10.0.0.1, the last 1 has 0 as prefix ) #ipfw table 1 list ::/0 0 >>>> >>>> #ipfw table 1 delete ::/0 ipfw: setsockopt(IP_FW_TABLE_XDEL): No >>>> such process >>>> >>>> >>>> I guess that, this problem is related to radix mask calculation >>>> problem/fix. > Hello. > I'm sorry, it seems that key lookups were broken for quite a long time. > > Can you apply attached patch, rebuild ipfw(8) binary and see if this > helps? > > >>>> >>>> Is there a quick solution for this. Best, regards, >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To >>>> unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >>>> > >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature