On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Ian Smith <smi...@nimnet.asn.au> wrote:
However, looking at the review patch, I do wonder if the reass shouldn't > precede, rather than follow, the check-state? > > Absolutely, yes - fragments don't carry sub-protocol info. -- "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five hundred." - The Mahābhārata _______________________________________________ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
