On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:49:13 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Roman Divacky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 6 Aug 2007 > 11:04:22 +0200): > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:33:03AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> Quoting Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:00:35 > >> +0400):
> >> >I'm porting some Fedora Core 6 applications. Since the FreeBSD > >> >package of a FC6 port should be build with non-default > >> >compat.linux.osrelease and pointyhat is using jails to create > >> >packages, here is the question at the Subject. > >> > > >> >I know it _may_ be changed (I've tried and succeeded). Can someone > >> >say that it's quite OK to do so (without bad effects to jail/host)? > >> >Sure I ask about -CURRENT. > >> > >> Roman did some work to make this a per-jail feature. I haven't seen > >> any obvious stuff in the code which would make using this a bad idea. > >> So: there are no known side-effects to use this in a jail. > > > > I didnt do anything.. this has always been per-jail attribute :) > Yes. Sorry for not being clear. You did the right work from the > beginning to make the sysctl per jail instead of making it a global > property of the system. And the feature which is protected by this > sysctl should be able to work correctly for the use case. Got it, thanks. WBR -- bsam _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
