On 2016-05-28 20:30, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208001 > > --- Comment #5 from Jamie Gritton <ja...@freebsd.org> --- > Yes, of course there are cases where something besides a /32 is appropriate - > that is why jail(8) allows that. However, as I mentioned it did appear that > you had violated the specification that an alias should be on a > non-conflicting > netmask. > > The fact remains that I am unable to reproduce your problem. Perhaps I could > if I had your entire configuration - all jails, all other network setup. > > jail(8) simply calls ifconfig(8) with "alias" to add IP addresses, and with > "-alias" to remove them - see the output of "jail -vc" and "jail -vr". The > jail will not be removed if the "ifconfig ... -alias" command fails, which > implies that the command is succeeding. Unless of course there actually is a > bug in the way jail(8) is running this program. My guess is the command is > succeeding, but isn't removing some arp entry because the alias when > incorrectly specified when it was created. > > If it's clear (from "jail -v") that the correct ifconfig commands are being > run, then this might be considered an ifconfig bug. If the correct commands > aren't being run, then it could be a jail bug. >
I think that is actually the problem ifconfig -alias only accepts the IP address, not with the CIDR. #ifconfig lo0 alias 10.0.0.1/24 #ifconfig lo0 -alias 10.0.0.1/24 ifconfig: 10.0.0.1/24: bad value you want to do just: #ifconfig lo0 -alias 10.0.0.1 So jail(8) needs to strip the /24 off when passing it to ifconfig -alias -- Allan Jude _______________________________________________ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
