Hi Stefan, Thanks for the suggestion. I thought about just leaving the jail there but it drives me nuts when I run the mount command on the host and I see all these mounts from jails when I just want to see the host mounts.
-foo 07.05.2019, 06:10, "Stefan Bethke" <[email protected]>: > Am 30.04.2019 um 20:03 schrieb squiggly foo <[email protected]>: >> I use the mount.fstab parameter to mount a number of file systems before >> starting a jail which works without any problem. However since it is an >> application jail, there are no other processes running inside the jail other >> than the one application. As soon as that application terminates the jail is >> removed by the host. > > Would keeping the jail around be an alternative? > > With the persist parameter, the jail doesn’t go away when the last process > exits, and starting the same (or another) process with the same jail name > will reuse the existing jail. > > Only when you really want to get rid of the jail you destroy it explicitly, > including unmounting the file systems. > > Stefan > > -- > Stefan Bethke <[email protected]> Fon +49 151 14070811 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
