:> It's not worth doing. We would be introducing unnecessary cpu burn on
:> every single packet we sent out, all to solve a problem that doesn't
:> really exist.
:
:Well, that's why it's a sysctl defaulting to off in my patch. Don't
:turn it on if you don't want to.
:
:Kris
Let me put it another way: I think this sort of thing is an excellent
example of introducing unnecessary kernel bloat into the system. Who
gives a fart whether someone can port scan you efficiently or
anonymously or not? I get port scanned every day. Most hackers don't
even bother with portscans, they just try the exploit on the target
machines directly.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Niels Provos
- Re: non-random IP IDs Matt Dillon
- Re: non-random IP IDs Julian Elischer
- Re: non-random IP IDs Mike Silbersack
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Darren Reed
- Re: non-random IP IDs Alfred Perlstein
- Re: non-random IP IDs James Wyatt
- Re: non-random IP IDs Matt Dillon
- Re: non-random IP IDs Rob Simmons
- Re: non-random IP IDs Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Matt Dillon
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Matt Piechota
- Re: non-random IP IDs David Pick
- Re: non-random IP IDs Crist Clark
- Re: non-random IP IDs Garrett Wollman
- Re: non-random IP IDs Alfred Perlstein
