> > > > W2K and WXP can use IPSec, but it still uses PPP as far as I remember. > > > > > > But does Windows PPP support PPP bridging? I didn't think so. > > > > I believe that is irrelevant. The tun-device simulates two nics connected as > > far as I understand. Only the endpoint on the freebsd machine needs to be > > bridged, not the one on the client side. At least I can see all traffic on a > > tcpdump on the tun-device, even broadcasts. > > Maybe proxy-ARP is what you want then... ? >
I'm already doing proxy-arp. > > I would want mpd to handle the tunneling traffic for me, and then instead of > > sending the data to/from the tun-device (ng0), it could send it to an > > ethernet device (eg. tap0). That way I could not assign an ip-address to the > > tap-device, but use it for bridging instead. > > I don't understand what you're trying to do. But in any case it doesn't > sound like mpd does it without some hacking. I just want to connect a windows client to the network behind my freebsd gateway, and make it a part of that network. And i would prefer it to be part of the network on an ethernet level rather than e.g. ip-level. But I think I don't want to bother anymore connecting a windows machine, and just stick with what I've (almost) got working. Which is bridging two freebsd-machines using openvpn + netgraph. I don't think that it will work without some hack to mpd either, and the reason I now don't want to bother with it anymore, is that I just realised it probably won't work on the windows client either, without some hacking in the ppp-client. I'm just going to let it be for now I think. But thanks for the responses, Archie. > > -Archie > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Archie Cobbs * Packet Design * http://www.packetdesign.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
