>>>>> On Wed, 28 May 2003 14:48:22 -0700,
>>>>> "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I sent a PR into the KAME guys a few weeks back about an issue with
> setkey(8). The issue is that setkey(8) refers to the NULL encryption
> algorithm by the rather misleading name, 'simple.' I'd hoped they'd
> patch it in a back-compatible way, so that 'simple' still would work,
> but they've just swapped 'simple' for 'null' in the code.
We (KAME) provided backward compatibility, though the fix warned when
the old name is specified. Our latest code works as follows:
# /usr/local/v6/sbin/setkey -c << E_O_F
heredoc> add 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 esp 123457 -E simple;
heredoc> E_O_F
line 1: WARNING: encryption algorithm is obsoleted. at [simple]
# /usr/local/v6/sbin/setkey -D | head -10
10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2
esp mode=any spi=123457(0x0001e241) reqid=0(0x00000000)
E: null
seq=0x00000000 replay=0 flags=0x00000040 state=mature
created: May 29 13:37:27 2003 current: May 29 13:37:52 2003
diff: 25(s) hard: 0(s) soft: 0(s)
last: hard: 0(s) soft: 0(s)
current: 0(bytes) hard: 0(bytes) soft: 0(bytes)
allocated: 0 hard: 0 soft: 0
sadb_seq=8 pid=14308 refcnt=1
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
