On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:46:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:41:20PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:15:56AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Andriy Korud wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > At last I've managed to build stable NAT on FreeBSD box for 34Mbit link and > > > > ~2000 clients (cable modem network). > > > > At full speed (34Mbit) CPU usage is 0% and system load is 0.0 :-) > > > > > > > > > > It'd be really interesting to see how natd would handle such a load.... > > > > > You must be kidding. ;) > > Agreed. NATd "crashes" with 400 clients on AMD Athlon 900Mhz. :( ipnat > works fine. > > This raises a question... is there any point in still having natd? (don't > throw rocks at me please, I'm just asking). Or maybe it's still being used > for servers with less clients to nat? > If your Internet connection is 128kbit/s, it can cope with it nicely. One day I will write the ng_nat(4) module.
Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
