On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:49:51PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
...
> > The most common use of that table is to have an l3_addr and search the
> > ll_addr, right? In that case making ll_addr variable shouldn't have a
> > measurable influence on speed. Variable l3_addr could be different though.
>
> Well it seems to me that IPv6 neighbour discovery is different enough
> from ARP that it makes sense to have IPv4-specialised ARP and
actually, not too much -- the patch i used already included
nd6 code that borrowed a lot from the v4 version.
anyways, as i said, i need to think a bit about things before
making a decision.
cheers
luigi
> _______________________________________________
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
