> Sure. To make you sleep better it will be disabled by default (like > T/TCP) and possibly even not compliled in by default (#ifdef'd).
Part of your argument against T/TCP. :-) > A writeup will follow once I get there. I made this request before I > start working on it to prevent to waste my time on it if people wanted > to religiously stick to T/TCP. I think moving on from T/TCP is fine, don't get me wrong. And, I am all for seeing new schemes that buy us some of the things T/TCP was designed for. I am just not enthusiastic about dumping things into the kernel without some review and thought (by more than one person; and, that is not a knock on you --- if I had a nickel for every half-baked thing I'd implemented somewhere .... basically, it's good to get different perspectives). Doing this in a systematic way may have benefits beyond FreeBSD, as well, of course. allman
pgpNLYAZmDLn3.pgp
Description: PGP signature