On 5/7/05, Jethro Wright III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My problem is (per the diagram) rl0. > dc0 and xl0 are anonymous interfaces (no IP addresses.) rl0 has a local, > private IP adress. dc0 and rl0 are plugged into the same switch and therein > lies the specific problem.
man bridge(4): BUGS Care must be taken not to construct loops in the bridge topology. The kernel supports only a primitive form of loop detection, by disabling some interfaces when a loop is detected. No support for a daemon running the spanning tree algorithm is currently provided. Plugging 2 interfaces into the same switch counts as a loop. I've got similar problems here, caused by people using wireless shots to connect random sites together and causing horrible problems in my network: May 5 09:25:23 cerebus /kernel: -- loop (10) 00.11.5c.d4.0c.00 to fxp0 from em1 (active) May 5 09:25:23 cerebus /kernel: -- loop (11) 00.11.5c.d4.0c.00 to em1 from fxp0 (active) May 5 09:25:23 cerebus /kernel: -- loop (12) 00.11.5c.d4.0c.00 to fxp0 from em1 (muted) May 5 09:25:23 cerebus /kernel: -- loop (12) 00.11.5c.d4.0c.00 to em1 from fxp0 (muted) That's the MAC of my upstream router, stopping my network dead. I have to become very agressive with layer2 filtering with ipfw to keep the bridge from seeing packets on the wrong interface. -- Jon Simola Systems Administrator ABC Communications _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"