> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:26:40PM +0400, dima wrote: > > 3. Is at least implementation of NFS client (either kernel-side or > > user-space) stable enough for production use? Client OS replacement is > > impossible (hardly suitable, really) in my project. > > I built a big mail/web cluster a few years ago using FreeBSD 4.x (4.6.2 I > think), where all the front-ends used NFS to access data on a shared > fileserver platform (NetApp). It worked without a hitch, and still does.
What is the reaction on network/NAS failure? I mean, I'm about to provide transparent storage service in the case of failures of different types. > > Regards, > > Brian. > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
