Dontcha just hate broken vendor NAT?
Yes, it seems reasonable that SACK is the sacrificial victim.
Considering folk normally configure TCP-MD5 between routers which are
usually directly connected on the same switch, doing away with SACK
should be fine.
Funny, I was staring at that define moments ago whilst debugging a
totally unrelated piece of code in a different language.
Good stuff.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
