--- On Fri, 9/4/09, Artis Caune <artis.ca...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it still actual?
Hello. Yes, this is still actual. 1> netstat -nbhI em0 ; uptime Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Ibytes Opkts Oerrs Obytes Coll em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:14:22:17:80:dc 31G 93M 18T 36G 0 27T 0 7:50PM up 23 days, 15:40, 1 user, load averages: 0.84, 1.05, 1.16 The huge number of input errors is due to a 80-100kpps flood we received via that interface, which got the errors/sec numbers up in the 50k/s range for a few minutes. > You didn't mention if you are using pf or other firewall. Sorry if I didn't mention it. I am using pf, but have tried "kldunload pf" and the errors didn't disappear. > I have similar problem with two boxes replicating zfs > pools, when I > noticed input errors. > After some investigation turns out it was pf overhead, even > though I > was skipping on interfaces where zfs sedn/recv. > > With pf enables (and skip) I can copy 50-80MB/s with > 50-80Kpps and > 0-100+ input drops per second. > With pf disabled I can copy constantly with 102 or 93 MB/s > and > 110-131Kpps, few drops (because 1 CPU almost eaten). This is the kind of traffic I am seeing: Errors/second (5 minute average) per interface: http://www.dataxnet.ro/alex/errors.png Packets/second (5 minute average) per interface: http://www.dataxnet.ro/alex/packets.png Those graphs were saved a few minutes ago, times are EEST (GMT+3) I'm sorry I don't have the Mbits/s graphs up, I haven't been collecting that data per interface recently (it's collected per vlan). Alex _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
