On 3/8/2010 5:43 AM, jhell wrote:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 21:26, dougb@ wrote:
Oops, missed one.
Doug
;) Hi Doug& everyone,
Personally I think that ipv6_enable could be skipped(removed) all-in-all.
Here is my reason:
It seems needless to have if, the value of ipv6_network_interfaces could
just be checked against to see if it is anything other than null.
In the default case it is already set to auto and I propose removing
ipv6_enable and change ipv6_network_interfaces to be null and if it is
anything other then null ipv6 will be enabled in the same fashion it is
now but less variables to have to specify in the long-run.
I think your idea shows good creative thought, but I'm opposed to it.
First, I like the fact that in the common case the list of network
interfaces does not need to be configured for either protocol. It's too
easy to make mistakes, and particularly for new installs this is a great
feature.
Second, the common way we have to enable or disable things with rc.d,
including other networking features, is with the _enable variable. I
think it's reasonable to return ipv6 to being consistent with this.
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
