On 1 October 2010 06:55, Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> wrote: > In any case I didn't say that 6rd was not useful at all. What I tried to > make the case for is that its utility is limited, both in the absolute sense > and in the temporal sense; and that because of these limitations the > benefits that adding the code bring are outweighed by the costs of > maintaining it past what will likely be its useful lifetime.
People are going to be using IPv4 for a number of years. More than IPv6 proponents want or believe. I don't see the harm of doing both this work and improving our IPv6 stack support in general. It's all about choice, right? Adrian _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
