On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi <montha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Bernhard Schmidt <bschm...@freebsd.org> > wrote: >> On Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:42:05 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: >>> Okej, I run all four scenarios: >>> >>> 0->2 OK, but the first "ping -c 1" got lost >>> 1->3 OK, >>> 2->0 OK, >>> 3->1 FAIL, works after "ping -c 1" 1->2 >>> >>> looks like path is built correct in one way only? :S >> >> I have no clue about the mesh code.. but, that smells like there are a >> few frames discard which are supposed to fill the ARP table. Can I talk >> you into dumping frames on the interfaces to figure out where those >> discards happen? > > please :)
Sorry, but what was it you want me to dump? > >> >>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Bernhard Schmidt >> <bschm...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> > On Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:06:41 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: >>> >> Hej, wanna check if anyone encountered this problem: >>> >> I setup 4 mesh nodes in a link topology ( 0 <-> 1 <-> 2 <-> 3) >>> >> >>> >> But I cant ping from 3 to 0, or 0 to 3, without first ping between >>> >> the nodes to fill the hwmp route tables. >>> > >>> > Pinging 0 -> 2, 1 -> 3, 2 -> 0 and 3 -> 1 on freshly started nodes >>> > works though? >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Bernhard >> >> -- >> Bernhard >> > > > > -- > //Monthadar Al Jaberi > -- //Monthadar Al Jaberi _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
