On 4/28/2011 11:35 AM, Adam Stylinski wrote: > > And the rate output of netblast (using as suggested the parameters above): > 119091 > > This is about 454mbps. Still way slower than it ought to be. >
Yes, it should do way better than that. I just tried on a couple of 8.2R boxes, E5320 @ 1.86GHz (1866.74-MHz K8-class CPU). Different em nic. Sending side netblast 192.168.5.110 500 450 6 start: 1304007166.789433976 finish: 1304007172.789605227 send calls: 2829340 send errors: 1374103 approx send rate: 242539 approx error rate: 0 em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.1.9> port 0x2000-0x201f mem 0xd8a00000-0xd8a1ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 em0: Using an MSI interrupt em0: [FILTER] em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:33:53:cc The receiving side sees em0 Kbps in Kbps out 0.00 0.52 499822.2 0.00 931129.2 0.00 931126.8 0.00 931166.7 0.00 931064.4 0.00 931219.5 0.00 432451.5 0.00 0.47 0.00 -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, m...@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"