On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Andrew Thompson <thom...@freebsd.org>wrote:
> Here is a patch that changes it but I do not know what may break.
>
Thanks a lot Andrew. So, someone might be relying on interface type of
bridge being IFT_ETHER?
Who can confirm if this is a good patch?
>
> Index: if_bridge.c
> ===================================================================
> --- if_bridge.c (revision 232321)
> +++ if_bridge.c (working copy)
> @@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ bridge_clone_create(struct if_clone *ifc, int unit
> {
> struct bridge_softc *sc, *sc2;
> struct ifnet *bifp, *ifp;
> + struct sockaddr_dl *sdl;
> int fb, retry;
> unsigned long hostid;
>
> @@ -642,6 +643,8 @@ bridge_clone_create(struct if_clone *ifc, int unit
> /* Now undo some of the damage... */
> ifp->if_baudrate = 0;
> ifp->if_type = IFT_BRIDGE;
> + sdl = (struct sockaddr_dl *)ifp->if_addr->ifa_addr;
> + sdl->sdl_type = IFT_BRIDGE;
>
> mtx_lock(&bridge_list_mtx);
> LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&bridge_list, sc, sc_list);
>
Appreciate your help,
Hiren
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
