On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:30:51AM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: A> On 14.11.2012 19:47, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: A> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:28:23PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: A> > A> So, we can do the following: A> > A> 1) lock increments/decrements via some separate mutex A> > A> 2) do nothing A> > A> 3) take some combined approach: A> > A> > 4) Take it via uma_zone_getcur(ipfw_dyn_rule_zone); A> It acquired zone lock to collect per-cpu item data, but A> uma_zone_set_max() did the trick. A> > A> A> Patch updated: A> * UMA zone is now allocated per-VNET instance
Why? This only leads to more waste in allocator. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
