On Apr 27, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Unfortunately, as you see, most people avoid running head, waiting at least > for 10.0-RELEASE, or even for pfSense catching up on FreeBSD 10. So probably > this change won't be tested soon, and thus won't happen soon, Gleb, As a minor part of the pfSense team, I believe you are mistaken. I'm out of the office right now, but when I return, I'd already planned to duplicate the test in a test harness with several multi-core boxes acting as source & sink, and the DUT to include several popular platforms for pfSense running a set of software including running same across -HEAD, 9-STABLE, and 8.3, both with the pfSense patches (as pfSense), and without. I doubt I'll get this done prior to BSDcan, but I'll get it done, if only for internal reasons. Jim _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
