If someone ports the ethtool to FreeBSD, it will only work on the i386/AMD64/ PC98 architectures. Perhaps having these suggestions as options for the kernel/GENERIC conf files would be better?
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Takuya ASADA <s...@dokukino.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Because there was an discussion about new APIs to provide better support > for high performance NICs in Ottawa DevSummit BoF, I wrote a note about > "How Linux doing it" in that area. > > I haven't get a enough chance to talk about it in the summit, but I decided > to upload the note on a Wiki. > > Here's a link: > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/201305DevSummit/NetworkReceivePerformance/ComparingMutiqueueSupportLinuxvsFreeBSD > > I hope it helps to decide what kind of interfaces/features do we need on > FreeBSD. > > Takuya ASADA > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
