yup, absolutely right:)
is there any way to improve performance??? do you have any suggestion?
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Andreas Nilsson <andrn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, thats another problem :) At least dhcpd doesn't crash and could
> deliver the full range of a /8 network.
>
> Best regards
> Andreas
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:00 AM, s m <sam.gh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> thanks Andreas, but it can not help me. it uses all my RAM memory yet:(
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Andreas Nilsson <andrn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:13 AM, <sth...@nethelp.no> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > you're right Olivier, but you know i have a user interface for dhcp
>>>> and i
>>>> > should handle all the network and ranges which are inserted by user
>>>> and
>>>> > logically are true. network with mask 8, logically is true and having
>>>> > million available ip address, too.
>>>> > i just wanna know if there is any solution to improve my performance
>>>> or not.
>>>>
>>>> There is no solution with ISC DHCP. I doubt you'll find other suitable
>>>> alternatives, but you're free to try of course.
>>>>
>>>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
>>>>
>>>>
>>> One thing to try is to have more range statements in the block, like:
>>>
>>> subnet 192.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0
>>> {
>>> range 192.0.0.1 192.127.255.255;
>>> range 192.128.0.0 192.255.255.255;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
