> No problem with fnv_hash(). Doesn't it have bad mixing? Good distribution is important since this code is for load balancing.
FNV is also slower compared to most of the newer non-cryptographic hashes, certainly on large keys, but even on small ones. Of course, performance will vary with the architecture. > While I agree that it is likely that siphash24() is slower if you could afford > the time do a test run it would be great to from guess to know. +1 You might want to consider lookup3 too, since it's also readily available in the kernel [1]. T.C. [1] http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/libkern/jenkins_hash.c?view=markup _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
