Hi Jack,

 I'm on ixgbe 2.5.15

 I see a few other threads about using MJUMPAGESIZE instead of MJUM9BYTES.

 If you have a patch you'd like me to test, I'll compile it in and let you
know. I was just looking at Garrett's if_em.c patch and thinking about
applying it to ixgbe..

 As it stands I seem to not be having the problem now that I have disabled
TSO on ix0, but I still need more test runs to confirm - Which is also in
line (i think) with what you are all saying.




On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Jack Vogel <jfvo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What he's saying is that the driver should not be using 9K mbuf clusters,
> I thought
> this had been changed but I see the code in HEAD is still using the larger
> clusters
> when you up the mtu.  I will put it on my list to change with the next
> update to HEAD.
>
>
> What version of ixgbe are you using?
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Christopher Forgeron <
> csforge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have found this:
>>
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2013-October/036955.html
>>
>> I think what you're saying is that;
>> - a MTU of 9000 doesn't need to equal a 9k mbuf / jumbo cluster
>> - modern NIC drivers can gather 9000 bytes of data from various memory
>> locations
>> - The fact that I'm seeing 9k jumbo clusters is showing me that my driver
>> is trying to allocate 9k of contiguous space, and it's failing.
>>
>> Please correct me if I'm off here, I'd love to understand more.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Garrett Wollman <
>> woll...@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>> > In article
>> > <cab2_nwaomptzjb03pdditk2ovqgqk-tyf83jq4ukt9jnza8...@mail.gmail.com>,
>> > csforge...@gmail.com writes:
>> >
>> > >50/27433/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k)
>> >
>> > This is going to screw you.  You need to make sure that no NIC driver
>> > ever allocates 9k jumbo pages -- unless you are using one of those
>> > mythical drivers that can't do scatter/gather DMA on receive, which
>> > you don't appear to be.
>> >
>> > These failures occur when the driver is trying to replenish its
>> > receive queue, but is unable to allocate three *physically* contiguous
>> > pages of RAM to construct the 9k jumbo cluster (of which the remaining
>> > 3k is simply wasted).  This happens on any moderately active server,
>> > once physical memory gets checkerboarded with active single pages,
>> > particularly with ZFS where those pages are wired in kernel memory and
>> > so can't be evicted.
>> >
>> > -GAWollman
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to