On 2014-8-11, at 9:17, Michael Tuexen <michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: > Was there any suspicious output provided by netstat -m when the problems > occur?
root@laurel:~ # netstat -m 8186/2179/10365 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 8184/1214/9398/2036224 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 8184/885 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) 0/5/5/1018111 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/301662 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/169685 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 18414K/2992K/21407K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 544/57/8194 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs delayed (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters delayed (4k/9k/16k) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile root@laurel:~ # uptime 2:12PM up 37 mins, 3 users, load averages: 0.20, 0.25, 0.15 Lars
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
