Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote this message on Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:24 -0700: > Ok. It was a lot more convenient when it was a standalone module/tarball so > you didn't have to surgically extract it from the tree and spend a week > trying to get it to compile with whatever version you happened to be running. > So if you're running 9.1 or 9.2 you could still use it seamlessly. > > Negative Progress is inevitable.
The problem is that you are using an old version of FreeBSD that only provides security update... The correct solution is to update your machines... I'd much rather have Intel support it in tree, meaning that supported versions of FreeBSD have an up to date driver, than to cater to your wants of using older releases of FreeBSD... Thanks. > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 9:57 PM, Mike Tancsa <m...@sentex.net> wrote: > > > > On 8/12/2014 9:16 PM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote: > > > I notice that there hasn't been an update in the Intel Download Center > > since July. Is there no official support for 10? > > Hi, > The latest code is committed directly into the tree by Intel > > eg > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2014-July/060947.html > and > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2014-June/059904.html > > They have been MFC'd to RELENG_10 a few weeks ago -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
