On 30/09/2014 13:49, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Should work.
Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
Cheers
Luigi
Hi Luigi,
The netmap-ipfw be included in the FreeBSD 10.1 final?
Cheers,
Gondim
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.me...@gmail.com> wrote:
I have a problem, where I need to fwd a high rate of pps, and I dont have
enough CPU. It's around 900Kpps, so I would like to know if ipfw userland
version with netmap support will do fwd?
Here are my current rules:
00100 fwd 10.1.2.1 tag tcp from table(100) to any dst-port 80,1024-65535 in
{ via lagg0 or via vlan1010 }
00200 prob 0.500000 fwd 10.1.2.2 tcp from any 80,1024-65535 to table(100)
in { via igb6 or via igb7 }
00300 fwd 10.1.2.3 tcp from any 80,1024-65535 to table(100) in { via igb6
or via igb7 }
With those rules, my CPU interrupt rate raises from 30% to 80%.
If netmap/ipfw has the ability to fwd should I expect a better interrupt
rate and lower load?
Sorry to ask before actually trying but this is a production environment
and I don't have enough room to test, I would like to read opinions before
finding out a nightly window to do the changes and tests.
Thank you.
--
===========
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br <javascript:;>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
