On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:53:34PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> L> Then if you do sys/net/altq/ do you also plan to split the current > L> content of sys/net/ into separate subdirectories ? > L> > L> We currently have quite a few separate things in sys/net/, such as > L> - various bpf files > L> - generic ifnet support (including raw sockets) > L> - various libraries (compression and hash functions) > L> - routing code > L> - bridging code > L> - a ton of special ifnets, (tun, tap, epair, gif, ....) > L> - bridging code > L> that could benefit from a bit of partitioning > > I definitely agree that a) special interfaces b) lagg+lacp > c) generic libraries should be separated. I don't mind if anyone does > this job :) > > But I personally would prefer is this is done after the lifetime > of the projects/ifnet branch, since if stuff is moved while I work > on projects/ifnet, my merging will become a nightmare. I already have > conflicts quite often. > sure, there is no rush. I was just trying to understand why your preference is for sys/net/altq instead of sys/netaltq as we have for other components. thanks again luigi _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
