On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:13:31 +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 6/08/2015 1:02 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > On 08/04/15 16:13, grenville armitage wrote: > > > >> <de-lurk> > > > >> I'm curious about the uptick of bugzilla chatter turning up in > >> freebsd-net@ the last few days. > > > >> Whilst I can filter it locally, I'm puzzled as to why it would be a > >> Good Thing for bugzilla bugs to be "Assigned to" freebsd-net. > > > >> cheers, gja > > > >> <lurk> > > > > > > I don't know if -net is even the right place to assign driver bugs. :-) > > > > Even if I go through and move the bugs to driver maintainers right > > now, I think I spam the list just by doing the assignment. > > > > Sorry for the noise, some of it may be useful, but I fear most of the > > spam from bugzilla is probably useless. > > > > sean > > Signal:Noise is important, but there should be a 'pool' that incoming > networking related bugs can be assigned to (with notification), > independent to whether an issue/component has an individual or team > maintainer, so that interested folks don't necessarily need to go > hunting in Bugzilla to find things to work on. This is particularly > important for aspiring future committers > > Perhaps a net-bugs or similar?
Back in March through May an even larger splurge happened on -wireless by an enthusiastic new contributor submitting, as asked, multitudinous smaller patches to iwn(4). At that time I just made two new folders, bugzwireless and bugznet, and periodically - like the other day - move all messages From bugzilla and To -wireless (or -net) to those folders. No sweat really, even manually; my inbox is far more manageable, and I can more readily surf through these surely welcome heroic efforts :) Not only a lurker, but a largely useless one .. cheers, Ian _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"