Alarig Le lay <ala...@swordarmor.fr> wrote
  in <20151022230838.ga22...@drscott.swordarmor.fr>:

al> Do you have any idea about this issue? Did I make a mistake or is it a
al> bug?

 Is 2a00:5884::1/64 configured on em1?  An address within
 2a00:5884:8200::/40 is required on em1 in this case.

-- Hiroki

Attachment: pgplf0mxAUESy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to