Alarig Le lay <ala...@swordarmor.fr> wrote in <20151022230838.ga22...@drscott.swordarmor.fr>:
al> Do you have any idea about this issue? Did I make a mistake or is it a al> bug? Is 2a00:5884::1/64 configured on em1? An address within 2a00:5884:8200::/40 is required on em1 in this case. -- Hiroki
pgplf0mxAUESy.pgp
Description: PGP signature