On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 07:37:37PM -0800, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:50:52PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > A> hah, that's very pretty. The downside of a completely direct-dispatch > A> network stack. :) > > The stack is big, but shouldn't eat 4 pages anyway. Back in the netgraph yeha, exctly
> hacking times, we used to have stack exhaustion with much longer backtraces. > > I expect that somewhere on the list there something huge on stack. > > I assume Dmitry runs with -O0, this is compile that exposes stack > exhaustion first. Did I guess it right, Dmitry? > no, -O2 here -- Have fun! chd _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
