On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ermal Luçi <e...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé < > oliv...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Ermal Luçi <e...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> Yeah but for 11 branch still is. >>> >>> >> >> FIB4 KPI was MFC to 11-stable branch 6 weeks ago (r310771). >> > > I missed that and i created the patch on releng/11... i did not notice > that it was merged to 11-stable. > > Seems only solution for this regression is to create some IPSEC policies > than! > Which should be filed as a bug against the tryforward implementation. > > > Most probably this should be committed to on HEAD and merged back to avoid broken behaviour until the new routing code can complement the feature. -- Ermal
iff --git a/sys/netinet/ip_fastfwd.c b/sys/netinet/ip_fastfwd.c index c0c6186..dff4cee 100644 --- a/sys/netinet/ip_fastfwd.c +++ b/sys/netinet/ip_fastfwd.c @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$"); #include "opt_ipstealth.h" +#include "opt_mpath.h" #include <sys/param.h> #include <sys/systm.h> @@ -163,6 +164,9 @@ ip_tryforward(struct mbuf *m) M_ASSERTVALID(m); M_ASSERTPKTHDR(m); +#ifdef RADIX_MPATH + return m; +#endif #ifdef ALTQ /* * Is packet dropped by traffic conditioner?
_______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"