On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:21:03AM -0500, Kevin Day wrote: > > > > On Oct 4, 2018, at 7:58 AM, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:53 AM Luciano Mannucci <luci...@vespaperitivo.it> > > wrote: > > > >>> While I have no objection for general direction, I have doubts about > >> removal > >>> of ste(4) and especially rl(4). These are cheap 100Mbit VERY popular NICs > >>> sold in enourmous values in certain markets by vendors like D-Link and > >>> TP-Link using various trade names. > >> > > > > Enough people are using rl that it's off the list by my count. > > If you need any extra data, rl is the only one that I'd be sad to lose as > well. We have a lot of embedded devices that are still shipping today with rl > chips. I could chip in a little to sponsor someone to modernize the driver if > needed.
It's definitly on the STAY list at this point. If you could help get it update that would be great, especially if it's still shipping (a very useful datapoint). -- Brooks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
