> In message <23816.53518.998090.665...@jerusalem.litteratus.org>, 
> Robert Huff <roberth...@rcn.com> wrote:
> 
> >>  Actually, no, that's not how one is supposed to enable one's own set
> >>  of ipfw ules.  To do that, the Handbook (Sec. 30.4.1) says very clearly
> >>  that one should do:
> >>  
> >>      firewall_enable="YES"
> >>      firewall_type="path-to-my-rules-file"
> >>  
> >>  But I'm glad you brought it up.  The funny thing is that even that
> >>  doesn't work properly nowadays *or* like it used to in the past.
> >
> >     If this is true - haven't checked personally - then it's a bug.
> >(And a non-trivial one, the fact you're the first to report it
> >notwithstanding.)
> >     Can you please open a bug report?
> 
> I aim to please.  As requested:
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238694

Thank you.


-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgri...@freebsd.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to