On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 01:39:52PM -0800, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On 2/3/20 12:17 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > I am try to use Chelsio T540-CR in netmap mode and see poor (compared > > to Intel 82599ES) performance. > > What approximate FreeBSD version is this?
12.1-STABLE > > > > Same application ac receive only about 8.9Mpss, compared to 12.5Mpps > > at Intel. > > > > pmc profile show mostly time spend in: > > > > 49.76% [17802] service_nm_rxq @ /boot/kernel/if_cxgbe.ko > > 100.0% [17802] t4_vi_intr > > 100.0% [17802] ithread_loop @ /boot/kernel/kernel > > 100.0% [17802] fork_exit > > > > > > to be exact at line > > > > while ((d->rsp.u.type_gen & F_RSPD_GEN) == nm_rxq->iq_gen) { > > > > Is this maximum limit for this vendor? > > No, a T540 should be able to sink full 10Gbps (14.88Mpps) on a single rx > queue. Try adding this to your loader.conf: > > hw.cxgbe.toecaps_allowed="0" > > Then try simple netmap "pkt-gen -f rx" instead of any custom app and see > how many pps it's able to sink. Thanks! `hw.cxgbe.toecaps_allowed="0"` allow recive 14Mpps for may application too! Now I am got only 10% less performance compared to Intel, as I see by higher Chelsio interrupt cpu time (top show about 30% for every interrupt handler). Is this normal? Is this posible to optimize? This is interrupt rate I see: 54651 t5nex0:3b0 56475 t5nex0:3b1 55181 t5nex0:3b2 56577 t5nex0:3b3 _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"