Op 04-09-2025 om 14:03 schreef Lexi Winter:
Lexi Winter:
Ronald Klop:
With the story above is the patch still needed? I will test anyway to
see what happens. It is a RPI4, so compiling is a bit slow.
i was able to reproduce the problem here so it's not too important to
test that if it's a hassle.
there's a better patch at [0]. if you are going to test this, i'd
appreciate it if you'd test that rather than the patch i originally
sent. sorry, i realise compiling on that hardware does take a while :-)
[0] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D52380
Thanks, I will test in the near future.
NB: I don't know if my setup fits your setup in relation to where "host"
traffic originates. My bridge does not have an IP address itself. I prefer to add an
epair for local traffic.
genet0 <--> bridge0 <--> epair0a <--> epair0b
And in rc.conf:
ifconfig_epair0b="SYNCDHCP"
ifconfig_epair0b_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
This makes that epair0b is the interface of the host.
I like this setup as IMHO it mimics more how a host is connected to a switch.
In this way my host is next to the jails in the bridge. Things like tcpdump-ing
epair0b vs bridge0 are more predictable to me.
Regards,
Ronald.
