On Saturday 08 April 2006 13:32, David Xu wrote: > On Saturday 08 April 2006 17:44, Michael Vince wrote: > > I have also tried putting my Perl under libthr for a single thread log > > analyzer and to my surprise it even could process logs faster. > > I don't know why, but I only know I did some micro optimizations in libthr, > and the library is small and may be fully cached in L1 cache on athlon > xp/64 CPU, don't take it seriously. ;-) > > > libthr is also really useful for actually paying attention to tops 'thr' > > column since it does show actual true thread number activity, under > > pthread it shows a couple and under libc_r I could have 1000 threads > > going but top just shows 1.
Which makes me wonder if anyone has seen any realistic workload type under which kse library would outperform libthr ? My experiences have always been pretty much the same as yours - everything seems to be faster with libthr and in the case of mysql, even more stable. So shouldn't libthr be made the default one instead of libkse ? _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
